confluence vs sharepoint reddit

I am familiar with MS Access (10s of 1000s of queries of all types, etc). Now we’ll take a look at Confluence versus Sharepoint. So if you are looking for an alternative to SharePoint because it’s hard to work with, deficit to brand, looks bad, very static, and not user friendly then instead of dumping SharePoint and starting from scratch (that will cost you alot of time and money) simply get this SharePoint add-on that will solve all those problems in minutes and help you avoid the headaches of switching platforms. Also, the company has made some decisions that have disgusted users—turning their attention to other providers. So if you’re looking for a SharePoint alternative for secure documents, Box might be the route to go. There's no reason to build something in SharePoint. I want to track my customers’ visit to each node and I’d like to have a list of questions related to each node and I’d want to see how much of the description the customer understood. Unlike SharePoint, Google Drive doesn’t have project management capabilities. So while you can share and store documents with ease, it’s hard to pin down the roadmap for where an assignment is going. Information is out there, but you've no idea if what you're looking at is valid. 3\ every update from ms ever, sharepoint is the first thing to break. Learn more. What is it? Meanwhile, Confluence is made, designed and thought for web development teams. I have it hosted locally in my ESXi using Debian 8. Jira is best-in-class in what it offers and all the workflows, forms, and customization would take a lot of effort to reproduce in SharePoint. If you already have O365 i think you need to re-frame the question. FWIW, SharePoint consulting companies often will use JIRA for managing development/projects. However, in paying for ONLYOFFICE, users get access to another service: the CRM. So we looked at 7 SharePoint alternatives and examined how they stack up in terms of price, capability, and user-friendliness. I'll never use Sharepoint again willingly. The CRM feature allows you to add contacts from email to the CRM database, so it’s easy to set up. It’s an elegant document sharing and workflow tool, with a bunch of different options depending on your team size, the plan you select, your add-ons, and whether you want it hosted on your server or theirs. Use the right tool for the job. Bit.ai. I am documenting Clients Info (Phone Numbers, Emails, Rate Hours), Router, IP's, Passwords, NAS etc. It does, however supports Box (and SharePoint), so there are good integrations there if you need them. Confluence is soooo much faster to navigate and find things, but more importantly its way easier and faster to actually create content in it if you're using the system like a wiki/guides dumping area. Thanks for subscribing to the Process Street Blog! As a SharePoint alternative, Google Drive, on the other hand, comes with Google’s most famous ability baked in: the search feature. If you’re using SharePoint or one of several SharePoint alternatives and you’re not careful, you might wind up with a tool that’s so bloated with features it doesn’t really succeed at any of them. Hi Steve! However, the tremendously growing competition has broken down some niches where the generic approach of an all-in-one market doesn’t … I've seen some people have issues with formatting in confluence because theyre writing all the markup themselves, but the "what you see is what you get" editor has been so great for me. A different approach. Oddly enough, while I find Confluence easier to use than SharePoint, some of the same adoption issues especially when it comes to creating and … For those used to hitting their Dropbox limit and sighing, it’s practically a drool-worthy SharePoint alternative. You may even get featured in an upcoming article! Similarly, Atlassian Confluence and Microsoft OneNote have a user satisfaction rating of 98% and 97%, respectively, which shows the general response they get from customers. Unless there's some overriding reason you can't use a SaaS product like Jira, there's no point re-inventing the wheel with Sharepoint. We used to use it, but I was hands off other than retiring it due to a mission change making it unneeded. If your wiki server is running on a VM, you could just take a snapshot of the VM with a pre-determined frequency, save it someplace useful and spin it up somewhere else and then change the IP. Who knows? You can also export process templates as Word documents, and create email templates from inside the app. Some of this is that they’re not tagged well, or aren’t organized into proper folders. MUCH cheaper. It's a database, a directory and a webserver. A HUGE fan of Confluence! Both offer two-factor authentication, and are certified in compliance like HIPPA and PCI DSS, to ensure that you’re protected. Our groups depend heavily on JIRA, and I feel like sharepoint is being forced on us without management even knowing why we use JIRA in the first place. SharePoint is a bit too heavy, when all you want is to make wiki pages. Been in the same situation at work, so I built an internally hosted Bugzilla, MediaWiki and GitList. As a Sharepoint developer with 8 years of experience, I will tell you to NOT replace Jira with SharePoint in software development projects. a, Read Plus, we also use Jira and HipChat, and they integrate together very nicely. I’m trying to find a way to create a website that gives me database access (ms access preferable) where the website is structured like a knowledge tree. You could also have a look at Gollum, I believe that's still the wiki behind GitHub's wiki pages. If you have a choice I'd suggest Confluence for no reason other than user adoption and satisfaction. Hey Henry, cool tip about the add-on. A reddit dedicated to the profession of Computer System Administration. But anything more complex than that and you should just use a product designed specifically for managing software development. Then, you decide on how you want normies / clients / other people to consume that documentation : web page, pdf, epub? Relatively cheap for small number of users. What is it? Confluence wins in the battle of Confluence vs Sharepoint because of its usability, intuitive design, and focus on making its core feature as accessible as possible. As a developer (with 0 knowledge of sharepoint), I feel like it wouldn't be a suitable replacement for JIRA. Its success speaks for itself. Podio, one of the best SharePoint alternatives, is infinitely customizable, and users readily share how they use the tool with other people on the site. Workflows and processes are one of the features SharePoint talks up, but in a study of hundreds of SharePoint users, the platform consistently came up short. Additionally, laying out your spaces in a particular way will make using Confluence search easier, too. I agree that it feels lighter and easier to use/setup than SharePoint. Better Seach and Office integration than any other DMS available. But, definitely not a Sharepoint Alternative. (I've never tried this, and would still want my handy db dumps around, but I'm old fashioned.). Good 'ol Daring Fireball style. This is what i was looking for. We think more than 11% of users deserve to be happy with their workflow tool. Ok, cool. Guru. Reddit finally let me delete the second one which, unfortunately, carries /u/bloodniece's reply to me. No need to maintain anything as Attlassian is responsible for it. We recently rolled out Confluence, Jira and Service desk. What is it? Sometimes, dazzlingly so. No DB to DokuWiki either, so it's really easy to back up. They sort by industry and project type. It serves tech documentation very well. We use the cloud version and it was in place before I arrived though I would've made the same decision. Its primary feature is its storage ability, with a relatively low price tag: One important feature to note: external users can only view documents in Box for Business. You should be able to hit everything. Now we’ll take a look at Confluence versus Sharepoint. https://emgage.com/prime-sharepoint-intranet. Find him on Twitter and LinkedIn. Slack offers persistent chat rooms, screen sharing and conferencing. WordPress on the other hand, is the content management system which powers about 30% of worldwide websites. It’s easy to create your own process template. Sharepoint does offer some limited capabilities to create public websites, but its strength lies in building intranet portals which mash information with tools workers need to accomplish their goals. With customisation, SharePoint can come close to Jira, but why use tons of resources to get there when you get that from JIra out of the box. With Podio’s open API, users can create all kinds of apps (which are all free). Or, if you'd rather not reinvent the wheel, then I guess... Confluence? If you're only using a tiny portion of Jira's features and you really could manage your software development with a few Sharepoint lists and simple workflows, then maybe. Definitely sounds like something being pushed by someone that knows nothing about either platform. As a side note, non-profits and educational institutions can use it for free. A reddit dedicated to the profession of Computer System Administration. Yeah it threw us off at work but it's still a nice documentation platform. So we have a small team and we want a better way to store and index and search our documentation than text/word documents on a file share although that is simple to backup and recover and move around because it's a dumb folder full of files. Less effort.

Php Contact Form With Captcha And Jquery Validation, Prince Parade Songs, Translate English To Farsi Phonetically, So Weird Meaning In Tamil, Short Karma Quotes, Rotterdam Netherlands, Atp Explained, California Trail,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *